The projected occupant of Hong Kong is forced to silence any questions of meaning and purpose to finally spontaneously internalize the city. The awareness of the city’s subject is called into question. Subtleties become overwhelming and the layers and density of the city strengthen the idea of narrative because of the individuals need for a selection process. This begins to unfold the subjectivity of experiencing the city. The peculiar realities of experiencing Hong Kong’s urban space become a subconscious time warp. It exists as a lapsing episodic system. The episodic memory is of autobiographical events which are composed of times, places, and other associated emotions. The inhabitant experiences the city through their semantic memory in tandem with their episodic memory. They recall the memory of meanings, understanding, and concept based knowledge outside of specific experiences. This conscious recollection of the factual information and general knowledge about the city is independent of context and personal relevance.
In this ego-less labyrinth of devolving impulsory sensations the subject is conditioning perception. The labyrinth shows itself as a slow history of space. One can only participate in and share the fundamentals of the labyrinth, but one’s perception is only part of the labyrinth as it manifests itself. The invisible city exposed and disappearing behind all our categorizations. The superabundant information canopy is experienced visually and allegorically. It provokes this sense of narrative which in turn produces the false sense of identity. The unfamiliar is no longer a sensual element within the familiar. Freud speaks of the uncanny as the rediscovery of something familiar, that has been repressed. The uncanny is felt as the presence of an absence. Without this sublime structure the human body would be incomplete. "The body is disintegration is in a very real sense the image of the notion of the humanist progress in disarray."18 Vidler also mentions the importance in discovering the power in interpreting the relations between the ‘psyche and house, the body and the house, the individual and the metropolis. Media saturation prevents image and meaning to coexist. The image becomes imbedded in the architecture of the city. Meaning becomes lost with the idea of securing clarity of the marketing image or of this idea of a projected imagined life. The theme of image is seized for its ability to represent and communicate, rather then for its attempts at establishing foundation.
The word ‘image’ commonly refers to that part of a thing person, or action that appears to others, rather than to the subject that the image constructs or the method of its construction. The image becomes more than a façade, it becomes real. Communication drives the image however it becomes vacant of any real meaning. The communication gesture transforms context of thinking, to merely interplay with the process or idea.